Latest Never-Trump Senator Jeff Flake Moves To Save Robert Mueller’s InvestigationPolice Investigating “Suspected Hate Crime” At Tucker Carlson’s HomePlan-B: Democrats’ Strategy If Trump Fires Robert MuellerSessions’ Replacement Has A Very Different View Of Robert Mueller’s InvestigationBoy Scouts Suddenly Change Its Name To Be More “Inclusive” Toward Girls
The Voice Of The Nation
Archive: this site collects commentary originally published between 2015 and 2018. Dates shown are original publication dates.

What Exactly Would It Take To Power The Whole Country With Solar Power?

What Exactly Would It Take To Power The Whole Country With Solar Power?

Liberals will always tell you that keeping the Earth green by using solar power is the best way to go. While I agree solar power is an excellent resource, it’s largely impossible to implement and sustain solar energy powerful enough to run entire parts of the country. Yea, planning, you’re not good at it liberals.

So what exactly would it take to power the U.S. with solar energy?

Here’s the Powerline Blog to give us just a fraction of what we’d need. The statistics are absolutely shocking!

Don’t miss the next one

Join the Nation and get our briefing free, straight to your inbox.

solaramerica

The basic “green” project is to replace our current fossil fuel and nuclear power plants with a combination of solar and wind energy. The cost consequences of making this transition to less efficient forms of energy are almost inconceivable, but putting cost to one side, is it even possible? At Watts Up With That?, Tom Tamarkin and Barrie Lawson have authored one of the more entertaining scientific articles I have read in a long time. They actually undertake to do the math: what would it require to replace existing fossil fuel and nuclear power plants with solar energy as current plants are phased out over the next several decades?

There are many variables, of course. For example, if electric vehicles ever gain a significant market share, the need for electric power will be vastly greater.

If located in the Northeast, where power demands are highest, the necessary solar panels would ‘[cover] an area of 44,000 square kilometers or a square with sides of 210 km. Bigger than Denmark, the Netherlands or Switzerland.’ If located in the Southwest, you could get away with a solar installation the size of Belgium, or 50% larger than Israel.

The amount of area that would cover is STAGGERING. There is no way that we could ever depend completely on solar energy. Especially if other electric needs go up at any point in time, which they are expected to in the next 100 years.

While a viable solution to foreign oil isn’t in sight, don’t let liberals tell you solar is the answer. It’s nice to put on your roof to reduce personal energy costs, but on the larger, nationwide scale, you backward, liberal, hippies don’t have a leg to stand on.

(Source: Powerline Blog)

Blair Patterson

Blair used to be a devoted Democrat, highly involved in his local and state government. Until one day when he served on a larger, state Democratic campaign and saw the underhanded ways in which they tried to manipulate both the votes and the public. Now, a bastion for the conservative side, Blair wants to bring truth, justice, and the conservative American way to anyone willing to Listen. He lives in Kentucky and is on the board for his town and county planning committee.

The briefing that cuts through the noise

Join the Nation and get new pieces from the archive, plus commentary you won’t find in the legacy press — straight to your inbox.

Free forever · Unsubscribe in one click · We never sell your address.