It’s become somewhat of a joke that the democrats don’t really grasp what is going on around them, or have common sense. For instance, they are using car insurance as proof that the government should be able to force you to have health insurance.
First off, the government requires you to have car insurance ONLY if you plan to get into a metal can and hurl yourself at others going 60+ mph. And even at that, liability insurance is the only government requirement in most states. That is just in case you hurt others with your bad driving.
One frustrating democrat is displaying this liberal misunderstanding of logic and reason, along with our former first daughter Chelsea Clinton.
Under the guise of “increasing coverage options,” Trumpcare eliminates basic requirements for what insurance plans cover starting in 2020. pic.twitter.com/A9VCL0i8pd
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) March 7, 2017
So the moral is if you want to have a child, take your kids to the Dr., need hospital or ER care, to do it before 2020? No, that's NOT moral https://t.co/HkWNjMqqsi
— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) March 7, 2017
Well the first thing that jumps out of that at me is just the fact that a Clinton is talking about morals, but I’ll try and choke past that and move on.
No, the moral of that is that those who don’t need coverage for something should be made to share in paying for the coverage of those who do need it. A few well grounded Twitter users helped point this out to her.
I'm old enough to remember people having kids before the ACA
— Rich Weinstein (@phillyrich1) March 7, 2017
https://twitter.com/Dwarfclone/status/839127859486679040
I had a vasectomy, and my wife is post-menopausal. Why is it moral to force us to carry coverage we have ZERO need for?
— Jeff McIrish (@JeffMcIrish) March 7, 2017
But you see Jeff, the folks who think it’s their right to make you pay to let them kill babies, also want the right to have babies and then not take care of them, so that’s your job.
https://twitter.com/icrm1959/status/839094509023580161
Thank you, Charles! That’s exactly what I said.
One could almost get the idea that a Clintons version of “morals” is when someone blindly submits to what they say to think and do. Maybe it’s more about blind servitude than actual morality.
(Source: Twitchy)